An experienced appellate lawyer is a major asset in any courtroom battle.
Once the verdict is in, the fight often doesn’t end there. Having an experienced appellate lawyer on your side, one who has argued numerous cases in the Arizona Supreme Court and Arizona Court of Appeals, can make a significant difference in the ultimate outcome of your case. When your adversary knows that your lawyer is an experienced appellate lawyer a resolution prior to an appeal is often possible.
I have argued cases numerous cases at the Arizona Supreme Court and the Arizona Court of Appelas . I have reported cases in both the Arizona Supreme Court and the Arizona Court of Appeals. I have also consulted with other lawyers on appellate brief writing, assisted other lawyers and pro per clients in drafting appeals briefs and have advised others on argument before the higher courts. .
Assisiting other lawyers on appeal
I am also available for consultation and assistance on cases needing immediate appellant work. Fair and creative fee agreements are available to allow me to assist your lawyer with an ongoing case at the appellant level.
List of Reported cases*
>Arizona Supreme Court
Feldmeier v City of Prescott, 211 Ariz. 444, 123 P.3d 180 (2005).
Logan v. Forever Living Products, Inc., 203 Ariz. 191, 52 P.3d. 760 (2002)
Western Devcor v. City of Scottsdale, 168 Ariz. 426, 814 P.2d 768 (1991).
> Arizona Court of Appeals
Katan v. City of Prescott, 223 Ariz. 179, 221 P.3d 370 (App. 2009)
Douglas v. Governing Bd. of Window Rock Consol. School Dist. No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 210 P.3d 1275
(App. 2009)
Citizens for Preservation v. Reifel, 213 Ariz. 297, 141 P.3d 422 (App 2006)
Shoen v. Shoen, 191 Ariz. 64, 652 P.2d 302 (Ariz. App. 1997)
Amerco v. Shoen, 184 Ariz. 150, 907 P.2d 536 (Ariz. App. 1995).
>Federal
Benally v. United States of America, 216 F.R.D. 478
( D. Ariz 2003)
Johnson v. Shoen, 888 F.Supp 1009 (D. Ariz. 1995)
Johnson v. Shoen, 876 F.Supp. 109 (D. Ariz. 1995)
*In addition to cases reported, I have argued other cases to the Appellate Courts that the courts choose for reasons of their own, not to report as “official cases.”
|